ADVERTISEMENT

A new meaning to pitch count (long but worth read)

Jhawk4

Varsity All American
Oct 7, 2001
4,646
2
38
The pitch-count problem: How cultural convictions are ruining Japanese pitchers
Jeff Passan



Like
Follow
Yahoo! Expert

This week at Koshien, the twice-a-year national high
school baseball tournament that is to Japan what the World Series is to
American baseball fans, a 16-year-old boy named Tomohiro Anraku threw
772 pitches. During the final game Wednesday, Anraku, whose fastball
reached 94 mph earlier in the tournament, labored to crack 80. It was
his third consecutive day starting a game and his fourth in five days,
and those came after his first start of the tournament, in which he
threw 232 pitches over 13 innings.



When word of Anraku's exploits filtered out from Koshien Stadium, the
reaction depended on proximity. Nearby, in the Japanese baseball culture
that equates pitch count with superiority, Anraku was a hero. Far away,
in an American baseball culture that has seen more elbows and shoulders
blow out than ever before, Anraku was the picture of excess. For a man
who bridges the societies, Anraku represented something much more
unsavory.



"This is child abuse," said Don Nomura, a longtime agent who today
advises Yu Darvish. "Where is the guidance? Where are the people looking
out for him? Where is his coach?"



Anraku's coach at Saibi High School is a man named Masanori Joko. In an
interview with Sankei Newspaper, translated by Japanese journalist
Hiroko Abe, he said: "Considering his future, I didn't want him to be
overwhelmed. I've been in anguish throughout the tournament."



Certainly Joko understands Anraku is no normal pitcher. Only a handful
of 16-year-olds in the world touch 94 on the radar gun. At 6-foot-1 and
180 pounds, and with a year of high school remaining, Anraku is already a
favorite of major league scouts, who wonder if he can grow into the
next Darvish. His right arm today is worth millions of dollars, tens
millions if he improves, hundreds of millions if it stays healthy.









Throughout the year, Joko had held off on pitching Anraku excessively,
saving him for Koshien. Anraku's last name means comfort, and that is
what he represented to Joko: a blanket onto which he could hold tight in
a one-and-done tournament that turns teenagers into national stars and
coaches into great leaders of men. Joko, then, wasn't about to take this
moment from his protege. If Saibi was going to win, it was going to win
with Anraku pitching.



"He's the one who has led the team to the final," Joko said. "I wanted to respect what he wished to do."



Silly though it may seem to consider the wishes of a teenager as
anything more than fanciful, Koshien is baseball's Hunger Games. Players
find ways to survive. This was not just about fame or team or culture.
Tomohiro Anraku chose to pitch again and again for another reason. One
for which his arm may pay the ultimate price.








In Japan, there is no greater compliment for a baseball player than to
be called Kaibutsu. It translates to Monster. It is reserved for big,
strong players who perform at otherworldly levels during Koshien. If
you're too handsome or waifish, they'll call you Prince or some other
nickname. Monster is special.



This week, the Japanese papers started referring to Tomohiro Anraku as Kaibutsu.



Fifteen years ago, Koshien minted another Kaibutsu. His name was Daisuke
Matsuzaka. In his quarterfinal game, he threw 250 pitches over 17
innings. The next day, he pitched in relief. The day after, he threw a
no-hitter in the finals. The Seibu Lions chose him with the No. 1
overall pick in the draft. He spent eight seasons dominating Japanese
baseball. The Boston Red Sox paid $103.1 million for six years of
Matsuzaka. In the fifth year, at 30 years old, his elbow blew out and
required Tommy John surgery. He couldn't make the Cleveland Indians as
their fifth starter out of camp this year.



"Almost every talented player throughout the history of Japanese
baseball is abused," Nomura said. "Matsuzaka is a great example. He's 32
years old. He should be on top of his career. And he's going to
Triple-A."








There is a sentiment in Japan that goes something like: Eggs thrown at
the wall that don't break are called superstars. Pitchers, accordingly,
are told to push, push, push ? to be that superstar. The regimens of
Japanese pitchers are legendarily excessive ? hundreds of throws daily,
even on off-days ? and represent what many in baseball see as the
halcyon days before pitch counts infiltrated the game and seemingly had
no effect on reducing arm injuries.



It's an agree-to-disagree discourse between the United States and Japan.
The Japanese cannot provide any science or data or logic to back up
their methods because they don't want any. The sentiment is not that
they're superior; it's that if pitchers work hard enough to perfect
their mechanics, they will. It's a lot like the 10,000-Hour Rule, only
science and data and logic do seem to evince that muscle and tissue and
joints and cartilage and ligaments used hour upon hour will indeed break
before perfection can be achieved. mohiro Anraku grimaces after being hit on the wrist of his pitching hand by a line drive. (AP)



"When I was coaching junior high school baseball in the late '80s and
early '90s," Nomura said, "I was arguing with the league that we should
limit our 14-, 15-year-old kids to 60 pitches and no back-to-back games.
They opposed. They said it wouldn't be competitive. I said competition
can come from numerous ways. You don't need one ace to throw every game.
The reason I won four straight championships is I had four pitchers. By
the end, their ace has got nothing, and we're just hitting the crap out
of the ball. It makes simple sense. You have more pitchers to go deep
into the game.



"Anraku is the same thing. He had nothing. And he's not gonna make it to
the pros with how he's abused. It just pisses me off. It's not because I
want to sign this kid. You have a very talented athlete, and they're
destroying it. This guy can make a living in baseball, and you're
basically taking that opportunity away. It's like anything. If you're a
singer or artist, you can't abuse your gift. That's the responsibility
of adults."



It is impossible to argue with Nomura's points. And yet he cannot
counter these truths: Everyone in Japan now knows who Tomohiro Anraku
is. They know his arm is strong. They believe his mind is even stronger.
Ten days ago, he was a kid from the northwest of Ehime Prefecture.
Today, he is a national celebrity, Kaibutsu, Mr. 772, the kid for whom
Japanese teams will pay far more money now than they ever would've. And
he was able to fulfill his one true wish better than he could have
imagined.








Over the nine days of Koshien, Anraku threw 46 innings. The most innings
a major league pitcher threw in a single month last season was 48 1/3,
by R.A. Dickey in June. The most by a non-knuckleballer: 46, from Hiroki
Kuroda, a Japanese starter, who did so on 633 pitches.



Baseball's evolution to a game in which more than 120 pitches from a
starter connotes danger and managers carry 13 pitchers on a 25-man
roster is a direct reaction to an unsolved mystery: the arm. We know how
it breaks. We still don't know why it breaks or when it's going to
break or what is going to break. There is no greater mystery in sports
than the arm.



It's why last year baseball hemorrhaged more than half a billion dollars
for players on the disabled list. It's why in 2010, when high school
pitcher Dylan Bundy threw 181 pitches over a doubleheader for his Owasso
(Okla.) High School team, scouts at the game sat mouth agape at the
coach and player's willingness to flip a finger at the new convention.
Bundy learned otherwise when the Baltimore Orioles drafted him with the
fourth overall pick in 2011. He spent most of 2012 on an innings limit
and threw just 105 1/3 innings in his first minor league season. He is
currently on the disabled list with elbow tightness.



Following Anraku's 232-pitch game on March 26, he threw 159, 138, 134
and 109 pitches. Surely others at Koshien have thrown more. Just none in
the era of extreme caution and fear.



"This is completely off the charts," said Dr. Glenn Fleisig, the
research director at the American Sports Medicine Institute whose
studies on youth arms prompted Little League to enact pitch counts. "It
goes against everything we do in sports medicine in America. There's
talk about how things are done differently in Japan, which clearly they
are. But humans are still humans. It doesn't make any sense. Is an
80-pitch count perfect or 120 or three days' or four days' rest? There's
no perfect number. But it's inconceivable this can be reasonable."








In a study released 2½ years ago, ASMI reported that after following
nearly 500 baseball players for a decade it found pitching more than 100
innings in a calendar year increased risk of significant injury ?
either elbow or shoulder surgery or something that ended a career. While
the sample was small and consisted of players only from Alabama, its
findings reinforced ASMI's long-held notion that it's not necessarily
the type of pitches a child throws that can be harmful but the number.



"The way humans are built, whether you're a 16-year-old or an old guy
like me, your body needs 48 to 72 hours to recover from muscle fatigue
and damage," Fleisig said. "If you have a big pitching workout or run
distance, if you're fatigued where you have lactic acid and your muscles
are sore, you need time to recover. If you pitch fatigued and come back
in a day or two, your damage on your elbow and shoulder will add up. It
won't be new. It's just compounding.



"Small damages will add up to big injury. They always do."







It's about the family. That's what Nomura believes. Coaches will abuse
an arm until a parent says to stop. It's why he thinks Darvish is
different. Not because he's special or blessed or mechanically flawless.
But because his dad knew better.



Farsad Darvish was born in Iran and went to school in the United States,
and as much as Japan has influenced him in more than two decades living
there, the mentality of Koshien ? costs be damned ? made no sense to
him. Farsad knew from a young age that Yu was special, and even though
he sent Yu to Tohoku High specifically for its baseball program, he
would not let the pressure of Koshien change the handling of his son.
Over two Koshien tournaments in the spring and two more in the summer,
Darvish started 12 games. He threw 92 innings.



"The father was very protective," Nomura said. "Here comes the parental
guidance, the Western mind. I've known the father since Yu was in high
school. We talked about being abused."







The Hokkaido Nippon-Ham Fighters drafted Darvish, a stroke of good
fortune. Their manager was an American, Trey Hillman, and while the
workload mirrored most Japanese pitchers ? Darvish regularly threw more
than 120 pitches, the major-league red-alert threshold ? starters there
go only once a week. Beyond that, Fighters management understood Darvish
was an asset, and if his elbow or shoulder blew he would be worth far
less to a major league team.



Darvish stayed healthy. In 2011, the Texas Rangers paid $51.7 million
for his rights and gave him a six-year, $60 million contract. In his
first start of the season this week, Darvish came within one out of a
perfect game. And while the Rangers fret about their investment, it's a
concern more rooted in the volatility of pitchers in general, not of one
who has been mistreated.



"I asked [former major leaguer] Aki Otsuka about the mindset about how
much guys throw, starters throwing between innings during games,"
Rangers general manager Jon Daniels said. "And essentially what he said
was they look at it almost in the reverse. We see it as limit the pitch
count, limit the strain on the arm. They see it as perfect your
mechanics so there's no flaw in your delivery and you can throw more
without putting yourself at risk. It's almost like survival of the
fittest. The guys with the best deliveries and with the least stress on
their arm can continue on."



Scouts from around baseball went to Koshien to see Anraku, even if the
likelihood of his arrival in the major leagues was more than a decade
away. Two who were there filed reports with the word "abused," one of
which was preceded by "severely." It's difficult to apply a Japanese
mindset when scouting for an American team.



And yet through his experience with Darvish, Daniels tries to do that.
Because he understands that what is abuse to us is a virtue to them. And
what is a national obsession to us may look barbaric to them.



"Don't get me wrong. I'm not minimizing it," Daniels said. "[But] I'm
sure they look at high school football and some of the injuries we have
and say, 'I can't believe they let their kids do that.' "








A boy named Koichi played high school baseball but never made it to
Koshien, so when he was in college, he worked part-time in a kiosk at
the stadium. A girl named Yukari came to work at the kiosk, too. They
started talking. Both adored the twice-annual baseball tournament more
than anything.



Tomohiro Anraku's parents fell in love at Koshien.



"I wanted to bring good memories," Tomohiro told reporters in Japan, "to the two people who first told me about baseball."




Anraku throwing 772 pitches over five games in nine days was about fame
and team and culture, sure, just as it is for anybody. It was also about
family. Yu Darvish's family cared about his future. Tomohiro Anraku's
does, too, of course, just as any family does, but it also cares about
Koshien, because Koshien means more than it does to just about anyone
else.



During the finals, his mother said: "He has been working so hard until
today and finally he came to the final. I want him to pitch through the
end. He is young. I believe we are going to win."



And his father told him to pitch "with a high hand," because the mound
places him atop the field. In reality the pitcher is but 10 inches
higher than everyone else; in the throes of competitiveness, he can feel
atop a mountain.





Surely Tomohiro Anraku imagined himself on Mount Fuji after
Saibi's first game. For 13 innings, he dueled Ryota Shimoishi, inning
for inning, pitch for pitch, run for run. Shimoishi threw 219 pitches.
If not for the run that gave Saibi a 4-3 victory, Anraku could've been
Shimoishi, one-and-done, preparing for Summer Koshien.



Only he won that game, and then another four days later, and one two
days after that, and the day after that, and it brought him to the
finals Wednesday, where his mom was cheering and his dad rooting and all
of Japan watching. His father imparted some wisdom to him that day:
"Even though someone pulls you down, you can just stand up again."



He stood on the mound, atop his world, ready to deliver as he had
before. Then his arm said no. Yukari had made Tomohiro eat vegetables as
a kid so he could grow strong, and Koichi had insisted he throw 10
straight strikes before they moved onto the next drill when playing
catch, and all of that was for this moment. They imbued him with love
for this game and this place, and strong as both were, strong as he was,
nature remains undefeated.



By his 109th pitch of the game in his sixth inning, Anraku was done. His
fastball fluttered. The elite pitcher of the 232-pitch game looked like
an average high schooler. He allowed nine runs. The pitchers who
relieved him yielded eight more. Saibi lost 17-1. Anraku was a hero
still. Just not one with a Koshien title.



There is time for that. Anraku is a junior. He gets another Koshien this
summer and two more in 2014 before his professional career starts.
Three more shots at a championship. Three more opportunities to prove
his coach right. Three more chances to make his parents proud. Three
more occasions to test the limits of the arm and hope against all hope
that he really is the monster everyone wants him to be.

Memorable Moments on Yahoo! Sports:
 
Interesting read, especially considering that a couple of the pitchers from Japan throwing what we consider to be excessive did not get injured until they came to the states and were put on pitch restrictions.

Don't get me wrong, we can all agree that as the number of pitches goes up the chances of injury goes up, but as you sprint more the chances of shin splints goes up too...unless your body is efficient in movement and acclimated to that biomechanical movement over time. Japan takes pride in their mechanics, we focus more on the number on the radar gun (which mph has been shown to decrease when college flamethrowers in the USA are put on strict pitch count restrictions in professional baseball). The Japanese are extremely flexible and efficient. What's the difference between throwing 119 pitches and 121? Is 120 some magical number that can keep a pitcher safe? Clemson and USC starters in game one of the series, Montgomery and Gossett, both threw well over 100 pitches.

Arm injuries happen because of poor training/warming up, muscular imbalances, and mechanical inefficiencies. Take care of these things and you will see increased performance and durability, over time. Top researchers and pitching coaches know this. Pitch count increases the chances of something bad happening the same way driving a lot increases the chances you might get in a wreck.
 
That's a very poor analogy. With higher and higher pitch counts the risk starts to increase EXPONENTIALLY. The following are some numbers that Dr. James Andrews, a leading advocate for pitch counts, cites in his presentations:

Kids that pitch competitively 8 mos or more per year have a 500% higher risk of injury.
Kids that throw more than 80 pitches per game on a regular basis have a 380% higher risk of injury.
Kids that pitch while fatigued have a 3600% higher risk of injury.
Kids that throw over 80 mph have a 200% higher risk of injury.

I can't find the numbers, but risk also increases significantly when a pitcher throws a large number of pitches in a single inning. For example, throwing 40+ pitches in a single inning is just as hard on the arm as throwing 75 pitches over 4-5 innings. Of course, those high pitch innings never get factored into pitch counts.

Would love to hear your authority for the proposition that college kids don't throw as hard once they are put on pitch counts in pro ball. Never heard that one before. Besides, most (not all) college coaches tend to do a fairly good job of controlling pitch counts. It's high school, Legion, and travel ball where most of the abuse occurs. To see which college coaches do tend to push their pitchers to the limit, go to Boyd Nation's site and check out his Pitcher Abuse Points system.



Originally posted by carolinacombat:
. Pitch count increases the chances of something bad happening the same way driving a lot increases the chances you might get in a wreck.
 
Actually, the more I think about it the more I like the analogy. If you don't know how to drive properly and you drive excessively trying to reach peak speeds you're more likely to put wear on your engine, or wreck. Sometimes it's a small wreck and you're lucky and can recover, but all it takes is one time to mess up bad enough that you're finished. However if your vehicle is fine tuned and you're seasoned enough through your training as a driver you're less likely to crash or wear out your engine. Could it still happen? Of course, anything could, just less probable.

Now you've thrown out a whole lot of numbers I'm guessing from Dr. Andrews presentation, did you see him when he was at Furman a few months ago? I'm a big fan of his "thrower's ten" exercises, it's a great basic foundation for young ball players to keep a healthy shoulder. If you don't have it already I'd be glad to send you a copy.

While I do admire Andrews for being an advocate for healthy youth and being well published in the research, I can't ignore the fact that he makes a living off of repairing shoulders and elbows of all ages of baseball players. He comes in to play after the damage is done. He's amazing at what he does but he's putting a band aid on a much bigger problem. Restrictive training, or de-training. And it's not just the arm, it's the whole body, and this is even a small blip on the screen of an even bigger problem, which is our cultures growing trend of sedentary lifestyle.

The less is more thought process of babying arms to protect them has good intent, but ask Nolan Ryan if that's what he implemented in the Ranger's organization when he took the reigns. He was smart enough to know that every pitcher is different. Baseball struggles with this one size fits all approach and when I hear people give magic numbers for pitch counts I always love to hear their rationalization. Of course we want all players to be safe first and foremost, but throwing 30 pitch pens at a high school practice and then you're pitch limit is 70 or 80 for the game? If Michael Phelps trained for his Olympic trials like baseball pitchers train to pitch he'd drown at the Olympics.

And then people count innings...oh boy. If the pitch total is so critical why use such a vague descriptor? There are 5 pitch innings, and 25 pitch innings, huge difference.

The enemy here is the training methods, and the fact that throwing automatically creates imbalances over time that rarely are corrected or even assessed.

I think we are both on the same page, safety is #1, just don't think throwing less is necessarily promoting arm health. Everything is relative and the context play a huge part.

I'll post some articles you might like below.
 
http://m.espn.go.com/mlb/story?storyId=4359938&src=desktop
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=kruk/040521
http://m.espn.go.com/mlb/story?storyId=8012095&src=desktop
This post was edited on 4/9 12:04 AM by carolinacombat
 
carolinacombat, I would like a copy of the thrower's ten exercises, if you could send me a copy. I will leave my email address on here and you can send it there: livingamaxedlife@hotmail.com Thanks in advance.

To your points about pitch counts and training. I have a couple of examples to share.
Case 1: I had a player who pitched in JUCO for me as a freshman. He threw could routinely throw high 80's-touch 90. Over a 7 day period he would start two games, going generally 5 or 6 innings an outing, 85 to 100 pitches normally. On his off-days he would throw simulated game 1 day a week, 65 pitches. On two of the remaining four days he just ran, usually in the 4 to 5 mile range and did his in-season 45 minute lifting program. The other two days, he played 20 minutes of long toss and would throw 25 pitches working on a particular pitch. To the coaches frustration and anxiety, he rarely fully performed the cool down that we wanted with post-throwing stretching and icing. The kid did not have arm problems during his college career, even at his new school to finish off his career.

Case 2: I had a player on the same team who was also a freshman. He threw low to mid 80's, more control and off-speed guy. He was a starter as well and followed the same 7 day pattern for pitchers that our case study 1 followed. the only difference is that he followed the post-throwing stretching routine and icing each and everytime he threw. He was great his freshman and sophomore year at JUCO. His first year after transfer following the same plan at his new school, he hurt his shoulder and was never the same again.

Pitching is not a one size fits all. Each pitcher needs to have a basic outline and then it needs to be tailored to his body type, mechanics, and style of pitching. It takes work but these two young men early on in my coaching career made that clear to me.
 
That analogy keeps getting more and more jumbled. But, I think we agree that you can lessen risk of injury by (1) good mechanics and (2) proper conditioning. But mechanics and conditioning are not a panacea. Even with great mechanics and conditioning you still put your players at higher than necessary risk by letting them throw too many pitches, letting them throw without adequate rest between outings, and by letting them pitch year round. The medical community (doctors and PT's, not trainers) seems to be united in their support of pitch counts, mandatory rest, etc. Maybe there's a maverick doctor out there somewhere saying pitch counts and rest are overrated, but I've yet to see one say that in print.

Do you really want to criticize Andrews because he makes a living repairing injuries caused by misguided parents, players, and coaches? The guy is trying to tell people what they should do to AVOID having to see him.

Did not see Andrews at Furman. These are the numbers he quotes in all of his speeches. David List wrote an article for Diamond Prospects a few years ago about a presentation Andrews gave, I believe in Columbia. There also used to be video of a similar presentation he and Glenn Fleisig did on the LL site.

I am very familiar with The Throwers Ten. I still have the pdf on my computer. Unfortunately, ASMI took the Throwers Ten off of their site a few years ago, www.asmi.org. I think they're just trying to get people to buy their publications, Conditioning Program for Baseball Pitchers and Preventitive and Rehabilitative Exercises for the Shoulder and Elbow. I have both. They're similar to the Throwers Ten, but FAR more thorough. But, one thing you will note in these publications is that they advocate that pitchers do NO THROWING, or other overhead activities like swimming, for 3-4 continuous months per year. Bet that one doesn't go over too well in the travel ball industry.

There's actually another pdf called the Lower Body 10 that I got from one of the ASMI associates. Don't know why they never put it on the site. I'll be happy to send it to anyone who wants it. It's fairly basic stuff, but some people might find it of interest.

You might also take a look at Alan Jaeger's Thrive on Throwing program. I bought the video and J-bands for my son 10 years ago and have been using it/them ever since. Jaeger is the guy that Ryan brought in. There's nothing really earth shattering about what he does. His tubing/bands routine is similar to ASMI's. The big them with him is he advocates full, max out long toss, as opposed to the 120-150 max routine followed by many teams. Not sure what his position is with regard to year round throwing, but he may not be as against it as Andrews. His general philosphy is to Listen To Your Arm when it comes to long toss. Some of his guys, like Bauer, may actually long toss on consecutive days, rather than every other day.

You're exactly right about counting innings. Makes absolutely no sense. It took Andrews years to convince most of the youth organizations to change to pitches. Unfortunately, organizations like USSSA and the SCHSL are still behind the times when it comes to protecting arms.

You're dead on about training methods and imbalances that are never identified and corrected. Take 10 kids at random and run them through some tubing exercises. I bet at least 8 of them will have substitution patterns, especially with external rotation. Unfortunately, these issues are usually ignored at the youth and HS levels.
 
@baseball31ne - you have a great example of why each pitcher is different. I've emailed you the PDF of throwers ten.

@palmettobbfan - I do have Jaeger's stuff, I like what he does especially concerning each player listening to their arm, and also "taking the arm for a walk". It's fun to watch guys throw 320+ feet long toss, the 120 ft approach put in place by doctors and team physicians has trickled down to youth ball and can put a glass ceiling on kids who think they have more in the tank or are not reaching their peak potential.

As far as Andrews, it's not as much of a criticism, I commend him for advocating, being the most respected physician when it comes to arm repair, and promoting safety for youth. Just saying he wouldn't be as wealthy if almost everyone had healthy arms.

I'd love to check out the lower body 10, had not heard of that but I'm glad there is something to accompany the throwing. Would you mind emailing it to info@carolinacombat.org ? Many thanks.

I've got a few more articles I think you'll find interesting, mentions of Jaeger, Andrews, ASMI, as well as Matsuzaka's take on his success/short comings through the differences in training between Japan and US(he used to throw 300 pitch pens the day before a game!) interesting reads if nothing else.

Baseball articles

Matsuzaka
http://mobile.boston.com/art/39//sports/baseball/redsox/extras/extra_bases/2009/07/matsuzaka_criti;jsessionid=747CD3F218CB37A4B87F3D64E98DB37D?single=1

http://www.training-conditioning.com/2007/04/striking_out_conventional_pitc.html

Jaeger
http://baseballtips.com/armsregressing.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/17/sports/baseball/17pitchers.html?_r=0
 
It would be next to impossible to make comparisons between Japanese and American philosophies. Not just as they apply to baseball, but life in general. What we may consider child abuse, they may consider the sacrifice one makes for the honor of their team and coach.

All humans and therefore all pitchers are not equal. So pitch counts are a guideline that concientous coaches use to prevent injuries. I for one do not think that all High School or College coaches for that matter, are expert enough to devise a better method of preventing injury than the one prescribed by Dr. Andrews. I have read several books on the subject of protecting and developing pitchers. Unfortunately, these were usually written by professionals and pertained to adults, not juveniles. In my opinion, the prudent coach would stick with those guidelines as prescribed.
 
According to Nationals assistant GM Roy Clark:
"Most pitchers, especially at the college level, they're going to back off of their velocity (as pros) because of the workload. Instead of going once a week, it's every fifth day."

Interesting article on "High School Velocity: Too Much Of A Good Thing."
http://www.baseballamerica.com/draft/high-school-velocity-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#.UXlbRj-A2sc.twitter

Not saying I agree, but it's an interesting article nonetheless.

Originally posted by carolinacombat:
..... (which mph has been shown to decrease when college flamethrowers in the USA are put on strict pitch count restrictions in professional baseball)....
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT